🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."